The Eleaf iVeni and OXVA Xlim Pro 3 are two pod vapes that share several similarities on paper, including matching coil resistance options and identical charge times, but differ in battery capacity, output, and weight.
This comparison looks at what the spec sheet actually supports, category by category, without declaring an overall winner where the evidence does not allow it.
| Spec | Eleaf iVeni | OXVA Xlim Pro 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |
| Battery capacityBattery | 1100 mAh | 🏆 1500 mAh |
| Max outputPerformance | 🏆 40 W | 30 W |
| Battery typeBattery | Internal | Not stated |
| Display screenConvenience | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable airflowConvenience | Yes | Yes |
| Variable wattagePerformance | Not stated | Yes |
| Charge time to 80%Battery | 30 min | 30 min |
| Charge currentBattery | 2 A | 2 A |
| WeightConvenience | 88 g | 🏆 77.4 g |
| Coil resistancesPerformance | 0.4Ω, 0.6Ω, 0.8Ω, 1.2Ω | 0.4Ω, 0.6Ω, 0.8Ω, 1.2Ω |
| Charging portBattery | USB-C | USB Type-C |
| Build materialConvenience | Not stated | Zinc alloy + PCTG |
| Best US priceat time of comparison | $17.77* | $24.49* |
| Read Review & Best Price | Read Review & Best Price |
* Lowest US price we found on 9 Aug 2026. Prices change often — see each review below for live pricing.
Battery
The OXVA Xlim Pro 3 wins the battery category on the strength of its 1500 mAh cell versus the 1100 mAh unit in the Eleaf iVeni, a meaningful gap that should translate to longer use between charges. Both devices charge to 80% in the same 30 minutes at the same 2A current, so the difference comes down to raw capacity rather than charging speed. The Eleaf iVeni’s battery type is listed as internal, while OXVA does not state this for the Xlim Pro 3, but that detail does not affect the capacity-based result.
Performance
The Eleaf iVeni takes the performance category with a 40 W max output compared to 30 W for the OXVA Xlim Pro 3, giving it a higher ceiling for vapor production. Both devices offer the same set of coil resistances (0.4Ω, 0.6Ω, 0.8Ω, 1.2Ω), so the output difference is the clearest performance distinction available in the data. The Xlim Pro 3 does list variable wattage as a feature, which the iVeni’s spec sheet does not confirm one way or the other, but this is treated as no comparable data rather than a performance win for either side.
Convenience
Convenience ends in a tie. Both devices include a display screen and adjustable airflow, and both use a USB-C style charging port, though the exact port naming differs slightly in the source material without indicating an actual functional difference. The OXVA Xlim Pro 3 is lighter at 77.4 g versus 88 g for the Eleaf iVeni, but weight was not factored into the convenience category outcome, so the tie stands on the shared feature set.
The Eleaf iVeni suits vapers who prioritize higher maximum output at 40 W over battery size.
The OXVA Xlim Pro 3 suits vapers who want a larger 1500 mAh battery in a lighter 77.4 g device.
The verdict
Neither device sweeps the comparison. The OXVA Xlim Pro 3 has the larger battery and lighter build, the Eleaf iVeni offers higher maximum output, and convenience comes down to a tie thanks to matching screens, airflow control, and charging behavior. Shoppers should weigh whether longer battery life or higher wattage matters more for their vaping style, since the available facts do not support naming a single overall winner.