The GeekVape Aegis Boost 3 and SMOK IPX 80 both target vapers who want a durable, pocket-friendly device with a built-in display. On paper they share a lot of common ground, including battery capacity and core feature sets.
This comparison sticks to what is actually documented for each device. In several areas, one brand publishes a figure the other simply does not, which limits how many categories can be fairly scored.
| Spec | GeekVape Aegis Boost 3 | SMOK IPX 80 |
|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |
| Battery capacityBattery | 3000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Max outputPerformance | 60 W | 🏆 80 W |
| Battery typeBattery | built-in | Internal |
| Display screenConvenience | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable airflowConvenience | Not stated | Yes |
| Variable wattagePerformance | Yes | Yes |
| Charge time to 80%Battery | Not stated | 90 min |
| Charge currentBattery | Not stated | 1.4 A |
| WeightConvenience | Not stated | 130 g |
| Coil resistancesPerformance | 0.1–2.0 ohm | 0.15ohm–3ohm |
| Charging portBattery | Type-C | USB Type-C, max 1.4A |
| Build materialConvenience | rubberized coating | leatherette |
| Best US priceat time of comparison | $29.99* | $30.99* |
| Read Review & Best Price | Read Review & Best Price |
* Lowest US price we found on 17 Aug 2026. Prices change often — see each review below for live pricing.
Battery
Both devices list a 3000 mAh battery, so on capacity alone they are evenly matched, resulting in a tie. The GeekVape Aegis Boost 3 lists its battery as “built-in” while the SMOK IPX 80 lists “Internal,” which describe the same basic setup rather than a meaningful difference. The SMOK IPX 80 does publish a charge time to 80% (90 minutes) and a charge current (1.4 A), but since GeekVape Aegis Boost 3 has no equivalent figures listed, those specific data points can’t be used to separate the two — the category result remains a tie based on the shared capacity.
Performance
The SMOK IPX 80 has a higher stated max output at 80 W compared to the GeekVape Aegis Boost 3’s 60 W, and both support variable wattage. Despite that gap in wattage, the overall performance category is marked a tie, which reflects that a single higher wattage figure doesn’t capture the full performance picture when other elements, like coil resistance range (0.1–2.0 ohm for GeekVape Aegis Boost 3 versus 0.15ohm–3ohm for SMOK IPX 80), aren’t directly comparable in the data provided.
Convenience
Both devices include a display screen and a USB Type-C charging port, which supports the tie result here. The SMOK IPX 80 adds documented conveniences like adjustable airflow and a listed weight (130 g), while the GeekVape Aegis Boost 3 leaves airflow as “Not stated” and doesn’t list a weight at all. Build material also differs — rubberized coating on the GeekVape Aegis Boost 3 versus leatherette on the SMOK IPX 80 — but with no comparable data to weigh grip or durability claims against each other, the tie stands on the shared core convenience features.
The GeekVape Aegis Boost 3 suits buyers who want a device with matching core specs to the SMOK IPX 80 and prefer a rubberized coating build.
The SMOK IPX 80 suits buyers who want more fully documented specs, including charge time, charge current, weight, and adjustable airflow.
The verdict
Neither device comes out ahead overall, since every scored category — battery, performance, and convenience — ends in a tie based on the available facts. The SMOK IPX 80 does publish more granular specs, including charge time, charge current, weight, and adjustable airflow, which may appeal to buyers who like having those numbers up front. The GeekVape Aegis Boost 3 matches it on the fundamentals that are directly comparable, like battery capacity, display, and variable wattage, even though several of its specs are simply not stated. Choosing between them may come down to build material preference or trust in a fuller spec sheet rather than a clear performance gap.