The Geekvape Aegis Nano 3 and Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod are both compact pod-style devices that share the same battery capacity and weight, which makes their differences come down to details like charge speed, output, and airflow control.
This comparison sticks to the specs and notes provided for each device, calling out where one product has a real edge and where the data simply is not comparable.
| Spec | Geekvape Aegis Nano 3 | Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod |
|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |
| Battery capacityBattery | 1600 mAh | 1600 mAh |
| Max outputPerformance | 30 W | 🏆 35 W |
| Battery typeBattery | Built-in | Internal |
| Display screenConvenience | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable airflowConvenience | Not stated | Yes |
| Variable wattagePerformance | Yes | Yes |
| Charge time to 80%Battery | 50 min | 🏆 30 min |
| Charge currentBattery | 2 A | 2 A |
| WeightConvenience | 65 g | 65 g |
| Coil resistancesPerformance | 0.6ohm and 1.2ohm | 0.6Ω 0.9Ω |
| Charging portBattery | Type-C, 5V/2A | Type C |
| Build materialConvenience | Premium zinc alloy/ rubberised coating | Premium aluminum alloy, matte finish |
| Best US priceat time of comparison | $26.99* | $24.99* |
| Read Review & Best Price | Read Review & Best Price |
* Lowest US price we found on 6 Aug 2026. Prices change often — see each review below for live pricing.
Battery
Both devices carry a 1600 mAh battery and use a 2A charge current, so on paper the batteries themselves are matched. The deciding factor is charge time to 80%, where the Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod reaches that point in 30 minutes versus 50 minutes for the Geekvape Aegis Nano 3, making it the faster device to top up despite the identical capacity.
Performance
The Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod has a higher max output at 35 W compared to 30 W on the Geekvape Aegis Nano 3, which suggests more headroom for vapor production. However, the coil resistances differ in a way that is not directly comparable (0.6ohm and 1.2ohm on the Aegis Nano 3 versus 0.6Ω and 0.9Ω on the Caliburn G5 Pod), and both support variable wattage, so overall performance is called a tie rather than a clear win for either side.
Convenience
Both devices include a display screen and use Type-C charging, and they weigh the same at 65 g, so day-to-day handling is similar. The Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod lists adjustable airflow while the Geekvape Aegis Nano 3 does not state this feature, and charging port details and build materials are described differently enough that they are not directly comparable, so convenience overall lands as a tie.
The Geekvape Aegis Nano 3 suits buyers who want a device with matching core specs to the Caliburn G5 Pod and are not concerned with faster charging or slightly higher wattage.
The Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod suits buyers who want quicker charging and a higher max output in a device with the same battery capacity and weight as the Aegis Nano 3.
The verdict
Neither the Geekvape Aegis Nano 3 nor the Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod comes out ahead across the board. The Caliburn G5 Pod wins on battery thanks to its faster charge time, while performance and convenience are ties based on the available specs. Differences in build material, coil resistance, and charging port details are not directly comparable, so buyers should weigh the confirmed wins alongside their own priorities rather than expect one device to dominate.