The OXVA XLIM 3 Ultra and OXVA Xlim Pro 3 share the same core hardware platform, from battery capacity to output and coil options. On paper, most of their specifications line up closely, which makes the small differences that do exist worth a closer look.
This comparison sticks strictly to the confirmed specs for both devices, calling out ties where the numbers match and being upfront where the data available isn’t enough to declare a winner.
| Spec | OXVA XLIM 3 Ultra | OXVA Xlim Pro 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |
| Battery capacityBattery | 1500 mAh | 1500 mAh |
| Max outputPerformance | 30 W | 30 W |
| Battery typeBattery | Internal | Not stated |
| Display screenConvenience | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable airflowConvenience | Yes | Yes |
| Variable wattagePerformance | Yes | Yes |
| Charge time to 80%Battery | 30 min | 30 min |
| Charge currentBattery | 2 A | 2 A |
| WeightConvenience | 90 g | 🏆 77.4 g |
| Coil resistancesPerformance | 0.4Ω, 0.6Ω, 0.8Ω, 1.2Ω | 0.4Ω, 0.6Ω, 0.8Ω, 1.2Ω |
| Charging portBattery | Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Build materialConvenience | Zinc alloy with IML/PU finish | Zinc alloy + PCTG |
| Best US priceat time of comparison | $32.99* | $24.49* |
| Read Review & Best Price | Read Review & Best Price |
* Lowest US price we found on 20 Aug 2026. Prices change often — see each review below for live pricing.
Battery
Battery is a tie. Both devices use a 1500 mAh internal-capacity cell, charge to 80% in the same 30 minutes, and accept the same 2 A charge current. The OXVA XLIM 3 Ultra explicitly lists an internal battery type, while the OXVA Xlim Pro 3’s battery type isn’t stated, but the matching capacity, charge time, and charge current figures mean there’s no practical difference to report on battery performance.
Performance
Performance also ties. Both devices max out at 30 W, offer variable wattage, and support the identical set of coil resistances (0.4Ω, 0.6Ω, 0.8Ω, 1.2Ω). Since the coil options are the same across both, output-side vapor production and flavor potential should land in the same range for either device, and there’s no spec here that separates them.
Convenience
Convenience is another tie overall, though the weight difference is worth noting: the OXVA Xlim Pro 3 is lighter at 77.4 g versus 90 g for the OXVA XLIM 3 Ultra, which could matter for pocket comfort or hand feel during extended use. Both devices include a display screen, adjustable airflow, and a USB Type-C charging port. Build materials differ in description — zinc alloy with IML/PU finish on the XLIM 3 Ultra versus zinc alloy plus PCTG on the Xlim Pro 3 — but with no comparable durability or finish data provided, this can’t be scored as an advantage either way.
The OXVA XLIM 3 Ultra suits buyers who don't mind a slightly heavier device and want the same core battery and performance specs as the Xlim Pro 3.
The OXVA Xlim Pro 3 suits buyers who prioritize a lighter device at 77.4 g while getting identical battery capacity and output.
The verdict
These two OXVA devices are closely matched where it counts most: battery, output, and core convenience features all tie based on the available specs. The clearest concrete difference is weight, with the OXVA Xlim Pro 3 coming in lighter, while build material differences exist on paper but lack enough detail to call a winner. Neither device pulls ahead overall — the right pick comes down to which secondary factors, like weight or finish preference, matter more to you.