The OXVA XLIM 3 Ultra and VOOPOO Vmate Pro 2 sit in the same class of pod vape, sharing the same 1500 mAh internal battery and 30 W max output. On paper they look nearly identical at the core level, so the differences that matter come down to charging behavior, coil options, and build details.
This comparison sticks strictly to the specs provided, calling out ties honestly and flagging where the data simply is not enough to pick a winner.
| Spec | OXVA XLIM 3 Ultra | VOOPOO Vmate Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |
| Battery capacityBattery | 1500 mAh | 1500 mAh |
| Max outputPerformance | 30 W | 30 W |
| Battery typeBattery | Internal | Internal |
| Display screenConvenience | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable airflowConvenience | Yes | Yes |
| Variable wattagePerformance | Yes | Yes |
| Charge time to 80%Battery | 🏆 30 min | 40 min |
| Charge currentBattery | 2 A | 🏆 5 A |
| WeightConvenience | 90 g | Not stated |
| Coil resistancesPerformance | 0.4Ω, 0.6Ω, 0.8Ω, 1.2Ω | 0.4–3.0 Ω |
| Charging portBattery | Type-C | Type-C |
| Build materialConvenience | Zinc alloy with IML/PU finish | Aluminum alloy |
| Best US priceat time of comparison | $32.99* | $19.29* |
| Read Review & Best Price | Read Review & Best Price |
* Lowest US price we found on 20 Aug 2026. Prices change often — see each review below for live pricing.
Battery
Both devices use a 1500 mAh internal battery, so raw capacity is a tie. Charging tells a more mixed story: the OXVA XLIM 3 Ultra reaches 80% in 30 minutes against the VOOPOO Vmate Pro 2’s 40 minutes, giving it the edge in charge time, but the Vmate Pro 2 counters with a 5 A charge current versus the XLIM 3 Ultra’s 2 A. Since neither advantage cancels the other out within the category logic, battery is called a tie overall.
Performance
Max output is identical at 30 W, and both offer variable wattage and adjustable airflow, so there is no meaningful gap in how each device can be tuned for a vaping style. Coil resistance ranges differ on paper — the XLIM 3 Ultra lists four fixed options (0.4Ω, 0.6Ω, 0.8Ω, 1.2Ω) while the Vmate Pro 2 quotes a broader 0.4–3.0 Ω range — but resistance range alone is not comparable data without matched coil specs, so performance remains a tie.
Convenience
Both products include a display screen, adjustable airflow, variable wattage, and a Type-C charging port, covering the everyday convenience basics equally. Weight is only listed for the OXVA XLIM 3 Ultra (90 g), with no figure given for the VOOPOO Vmate Pro 2, and build material differs (zinc alloy with IML/PU finish vs. aluminum alloy) without enough shared detail to judge handling or portability. With the listed features matching and the rest lacking comparable data, convenience is a tie.
The OXVA XLIM 3 Ultra suits vapers who prioritize a quicker top-up, given its 30-minute charge to 80%.
The VOOPOO Vmate Pro 2 suits vapers who value faster charge current, thanks to its 5 A charging spec.
The verdict
Neither device comes out ahead overall, since every category lands as a tie once the figures are weighed against each other. The OXVA XLIM 3 Ultra charges to 80% faster, while the VOOPOO Vmate Pro 2 pushes more charge current, and the rest of the shared specs — battery capacity, max output, display, airflow, and wattage control — are effectively the same. Choosing between them may come down to details this sheet doesn’t cover, like coil availability or fit in hand, rather than any clear spec advantage.