The OXVA XLIM PRO 2 and Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod are both pod systems aimed at everyday vapers who want a display screen and adjustable airflow without stepping up to a full mod. On paper they overlap in several areas, but a few figures separate them.
This comparison sticks strictly to the specs provided, calling out clear winners where the numbers support one, and saying so plainly where the data does not allow a fair call.
| Spec | OXVA XLIM PRO 2 | Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod |
|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |
| Battery capacityBattery | 1300 mAh | 🏆 1600 mAh |
| Max outputPerformance | 30 W | 🏆 35 W |
| Battery typeBattery | Built-in | Internal |
| Display screenConvenience | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable airflowConvenience | Yes | Yes |
| Variable wattagePerformance | Yes | Yes |
| Charge time to 80%Battery | 🏆 25 min | 30 min |
| Charge currentBattery | 2 A | 2 A |
| WeightConvenience | 67 g | 65 g |
| Coil resistancesPerformance | 0.4Ω, 0.6Ω, 0.8Ω, 1.2Ω | 0.6Ω 0.9Ω |
| Charging portBattery | Type-C | Type C |
| Build materialConvenience | Zinc Alloy + Artificial Leather / IML + PCTG | Premium aluminum alloy, matte finish |
| Best US priceat time of comparison | $15* | $24.99* |
| Read Review & Best Price | Read Review & Best Price |
* Lowest US price we found on 6 Aug 2026. Prices change often — see each review below for live pricing.
Battery
The Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod wins this category on the strength of its 1600 mAh cell against the OXVA XLIM PRO 2’s 1300 mAh, a straightforward capacity gap that should translate into more vaping time between charges. The OXVA XLIM PRO 2 does claw back some ground with a faster charge time to 80%, at 25 minutes versus 30 minutes, and both devices charge at the same 2 A current. But raw capacity is the bigger factor in day-to-day battery life, which is why the category goes to the Caliburn G5 Pod despite the OXVA’s quicker top-up.
Performance
Performance is a tie. The Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod has a higher max output at 35 W versus 30 W for the OXVA XLIM PRO 2, which could suit vapers who want more headroom, but the OXVA counters with a wider spread of coil resistances (0.4Ω, 0.6Ω, 0.8Ω, and 1.2Ω) compared to the Caliburn’s two options (0.6Ω and 0.9Ω), giving it more flexibility in adjusting draw and vapor character. Both support variable wattage and adjustable airflow. With one device ahead on power and the other ahead on coil variety, neither comes out on top overall.
Convenience
Convenience also ends in a tie. Both pods include a display screen, adjustable airflow, and a Type-C style charging port, and their weights are close enough (67 g for the OXVA XLIM PRO 2 versus 65 g for the Caliburn G5 Pod) that neither has a meaningful edge in portability. Differences in battery type, exact charging port labeling, and build materials are noted in the spec table, but the facts don’t give enough comparable detail to favor one device’s everyday handling over the other.
The OXVA XLIM PRO 2 suits buyers who want faster charging (25 minutes to 80%) and a wider range of coil resistance options to fine-tune their vape.
The Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod suits buyers who prioritize longer battery life between charges and a higher maximum output.
The verdict
Neither device sweeps the comparison. The Uwell Caliburn G5 Pod has the clear battery advantage thanks to its larger capacity, while performance and convenience come down to a tie once the tradeoffs are weighed against each other. Choosing between them depends on which specific figures matter most to a given buyer, whether that’s charge time, coil variety, or output ceiling.