The Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini and Vaporesso XROS 5 Mini sit close together in the same compact XROS line, sharing the same 30 W output ceiling and pod-based simplicity. The differences that matter come down to battery capacity, charging speed, size and coil choice.
This comparison sticks strictly to the specs provided, calling out categories where one model clearly leads and being upfront where the evidence isn’t enough to pick a winner.
| Spec | Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini | Vaporesso XROS 5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Image | ![]() | ![]() |
| Battery capacityBattery | 1000 mAh | 🏆 1500 mAh |
| Max outputPerformance | 30 W | 30 W |
| Battery typeBattery | Internal | Internal |
| Display screenConvenience | No | No |
| Adjustable airflowConvenience | Yes | Yes |
| Variable wattagePerformance | No | No |
| Charge time to 80%Battery | 45 min | 🏆 15 min |
| Charge currentBattery | 1 A | 🏆 2 A |
| WeightConvenience | 🏆 46.5 g | 65.2 g |
| Coil resistancesPerformance | 0.6Ω / 0.8Ω | 0.4Ω / 0.6Ω / 0.8Ω / 1.0Ω / 1.2Ω |
| Charging portBattery | Type-C | Type-C |
| Build materialConvenience | All-aluminum alloy unibody | Not stated |
| Best US priceat time of comparison | $13.49* | $16.77* |
| Read Review & Best Price | Read Review & Best Price |
* Lowest US price we found on 1 Aug 2026. Prices change often — see each review below for live pricing.
Battery
The Vaporesso XROS 5 Mini wins on battery outright, with a 1500 mAh cell against the Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini’s 1000 mAh, meaning more capacity to get through the day. It also charges faster, reaching 80% in 15 minutes versus 45 minutes on the Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini, helped by its 2 A charge current compared to 1 A on the older model. Together, larger capacity and quicker top-ups make the Vaporesso XROS 5 Mini the clear battery winner.
Performance
Performance is a tie: both devices top out at the same 30 W max output, neither offers variable wattage, and both include adjustable airflow. The main practical difference is coil choice, with the Vaporesso XROS 5 Mini offering five resistances (0.4Ω to 1.2Ω) against two on the Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini (0.6Ω / 0.8Ω), but there’s no comparable data to declare a winner on that spec alone, so overall performance remains even.
Convenience
The Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini takes the convenience win on weight alone, at 46.5 g against 65.2 g for the Vaporesso XROS 5 Mini, making it the lighter and likely more pocketable device. Both use a Type-C port and neither has a display screen, so those points don’t separate them, leaving weight as the deciding factor here.
The Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini suits vapers who prioritise a lighter, more compact device and don't mind a slower charge.
The Vaporesso XROS 5 Mini suits vapers who want longer battery life and faster charging, and don't mind extra weight.
The verdict
Neither device comes out on top across the board. The Vaporesso XROS 5 Mini is the stronger choice for battery life and charging speed, while the Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini stays lighter and more compact. Performance is essentially matched, with the extra coil options on the Vaporesso XROS 5 Mini a possible tie-breaker for those who want more resistance choices, though that alone isn’t enough to call a category winner. Which model suits better depends on whether battery endurance or a lighter build matters more day to day.


